Skip to main content
NexITC
B3 · AI · 6–10 WEEKS · BUILD

Model to production.
With rollback.

B3 · MLOps Factory™ productionises machine learning with model CI/CD, a versioned registry, evaluation gates, drift monitoring, and rollback runbooks. Not a notebook that got deployed. A model release process auditable to regulators.

DURATION
6–10 wks
DELIVERABLES
5 named
COMMERCIAL
Fixed fee
B3·PROJECTION / RELEASE TIME TRANSFORMATION
B3
BEFORE
21d
DAYS · RELEASE TIME
B3
AFTER
2h
HOURS · RELEASE TIME
WK 00
WK 02
WK 05
WK 08
STEADY
RELEASE TIME
21d 2h
EVALUATION COVERAGE
100%
RELEASE TIME ↓
98%
SCENARIO · UAE BANK CREDIT-SCORING · N=1
ILLUSTRATIVE
§ 00 · THESIS
01
WHY MODELS
GET ROLLED BACK.

Every UAE data science team we work with arrives at the same juncture. A model trained well in a notebook, evaluated once against a static test set, then pushed to a production endpoint by whoever had API access that Friday. No registry entry. No version history. No evaluation gate at deployment time. No monitoring for the moment the world the model was trained on quietly changes.

The instinct is to call this "deployed." It is not deployed — it is exposed. A production model release needs the same discipline as a production code release, plus a discipline code release doesn't need: an evaluation gate that compares the candidate against the live champion on real data, and drift monitoring that assumes performance will degrade even if nobody touches the code. B3 builds the pipeline that makes "roll it back" a five-minute operation instead of a crisis meeting.

STATE · BEFORE
Notebook pushed to an endpoint by hand. No versioning. No rollback plan.
STATE · STEADY
Versioned registry, evaluation gates, drift dashboards. Rollback in minutes.
§ 01 · WORK STREAMS

Six streams,
ending in auditable release.

The engagement runs in parallel streams. Pipeline design and registry setup front-load in weeks 1–4. CI/CD, evaluation gates, and drift monitoring overlap through weeks 3–9. Handover runs weeks 9–10.

STREAM 01
WK 01–02

Pipeline design

Assessment of current model deployment approach, target-state pipeline design, tool selection scorecard. Signed by your data science lead before Phase 2 begins.

STREAM 02
WK 02–04

Registry setup

Model registry deployed. Versioning conventions established. Artefact promotion workflow from experiment to staging to production.

OUTCOME
1
VERSIONED RELEASE PIPELINE
+ RETAINED MODEL DEV WORKFLOW
STREAM 03
WK 03–07

CI/CD implementation

Automated model build, evaluation, packaging, deployment. Configuration-as-code from day one — no manual endpoint pushes.

STREAM 04
WK 05–08

Evaluation gates

Automated evaluation harness. Threshold gates block deployment when a candidate underperforms the live champion. Evidence pack generated at every release.

STREAM 05
WK 06–09

Drift monitoring

Statistical drift dashboards. Alerting to model owners. Response runbooks per drift type — data drift, concept drift, upstream schema change.

STREAM 06
WK 09–10

Handover

Model-owner training, runbooks, and release-governance sign-off before the engagement closes.

EXPLICITLY NOT COVERED
Continuous model operations
after handover. That's C8 MLOpsRun™, our Run-tier retainer.
Model development or retraining strategy
beyond wiring the pipeline that promotes an existing model. Data science methodology remains client-side.
§ 02 · TIMELINE

Ten weeks maximum.
Six minimum. Four phases.

Phase count is fixed. Duration flexes with pipeline complexity and the number of models in scope. Milestones are signed gates — not aspirations.

WK 010203040506070809 · 10Phase 1 · Design & registryPhase 2 · Build pipelinePhase 3 · Gates & driftPhase 4 · HandoverPipeline design & registry signedEND WK 02 · GATE 01CI/CD liveEND WK 05 · GATE 02Eval gates & drift liveEND WK 08 · GATE 03Handover completeEND WK 10 · GATE 04OPERATING RHYTHMDaily standup · Weekly sponsor check-in · Bi-weekly Practice Lead reviewNAMED ACCOUNTABILITYPractice Lead — AI (CEO escalation available)
§ 03 · APPROACH

Pipelines scored,
not on vendor default configs.

Every engagement runs a six-criteria scorecard in weeks 1–2. Each criterion scored 1–5 with documented evidence. Signed by your data science lead before Phase 2 begins.

MLOPS TOOLCHAIN SCORECARD · TEMPLATE
CRITERIA · 06 · WEIGHTED 1–5
ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE RENDERING — actual scores are engagement-specific and derived from evidence gathered during discovery.
01
Model registry maturity
Versioning, metadata capture, and approval workflow depth — not just a model file store.
4/5
02
CI/CD integration depth
Native pipeline hooks into your existing build system, or a bolt-on requiring custom glue.
3/5
03
Evaluation framework rigor
Support for champion/challenger comparison against live data, not just static test-set scoring.
4/5
04
Drift detection capability
Statistical drift detection tested against your historical data — not claimed capability.
3/5
05
UAE data residency & audit trail
In-country processing options and immutable logging suitable for SAMA/CBUAE/ADHICS evidence packs.
5/5
06
Three-year TCO
Licence + implementation + operational cost modelled over three years against realistic model-count growth.
3/5
!
DISCLOSURE · VENDOR-NEUTRALITY
NexITC maintains commercial arrangements with several AI platform and MLOps tool vendors — these are how specialist consultancies build sustainable practices. We do not disclose which arrangements exist publicly because we do not want them to influence platform choice by anyone reading this page. The scorecard exists precisely so selection happens on evidence, not on economics. In practice, we have recommended platforms with which we have no partnership when the scorecard result favoured them.
§ 04 · ARCHITECTURE

From notebook to prod
to versioned release.

A typical model in production arrives with no versioning, no evaluation gate, and no rollback path. The engagement consolidates to a registry and a release pipeline, with model development retained but gated.

BEFORE · T=0
TYPICAL ESTATE
TOOL_01
Jupyter Notebook
LAB
TOOL_02
Direct API Deploy
MANUAL
TOOL_03
Excel Evaluation
SPREADSHEET
TOOL_04
No Version Control
FILESYSTEM
TOOL_05
No Drift Monitoring
NONE
TOOL_06
No Rollback
RE-DEPLOY OLD
TOOL_07 · OPS
Manual redeploy of last-known-good file
OPERATIONAL REALITY
  • One production model, zero version history
  • Evaluation is a one-time spreadsheet check
  • Rollback means finding an old file and hoping
  • No visibility when the model quietly degrades
B3 · PRODUCTIONISE
AFTER · STEADY STATE
TARGET-STATE
PLATFORM_01
Model Registry
Versioning · Metadata · Approval
PLATFORM_02
Release Pipeline
Build · Evaluate · Package · Deploy
↓ VERSIONED · EVALUATED · GATED ↓
MODEL DEV · RETAINED
Notebooks stay · promotion gated
STEADY-STATE OUTCOME
  • Every release traceable to a version and evidence pack
  • Evaluation gates block regressions before they ship
  • Drift dashboards alert model owners before customers notice
  • Rollback is a pipeline operation, not a scramble

Reference pattern. Some engagements retain a third stage where model complexity justifies it — a shadow-mode canary environment ahead of full production traffic. What always ships is the registry and the gate. Never a bare endpoint.

§ 05 · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

A bank credit-scoring
pipeline, audited.

Representative pattern for a UAE bank of this scale — a live credit-scoring model with no versioning or drift monitoring. Ranges reflect target outcomes NexITC underwrites in scope for this class of engagement. N=1 — illustrative composite, not a specific client.

SCENARIO / B3 / UAE BANK · CREDIT SCORING
DURATION · 9 WKS
DEPLOYMENT TIME
98%
weekshours
DRIFT DETECTION
24h
Was measured in weeks
REGULATORY EVIDENCE PACK
Per release
Was never produced
SITUATION

UAE bank running a live credit-scoring model in production, deployed by hand from a notebook eighteen months earlier. No version history, no evaluation gate, no drift monitoring. A model-risk audit had flagged the gap; nobody owned the fix.

ENGAGEMENT

9-week B3. Weeks 1–2 pipeline design and scorecard. Weeks 2–4 registry setup. Weeks 3–7 CI/CD build. Weeks 5–8 evaluation gates and drift dashboards. Week 9 model-owner handover and release-governance sign-off.

OUTCOME

Deployment time ↓ from weeks to hours. Drift detection cycle ↓ from weeks to a 24-hour alert. Every release now ships with a regulatory evidence pack — where previously none existed. Model-risk audit finding closed at re-assessment.

§ 06 · DELIVERABLES

Five artifacts,
each with signed acceptance.

Every deliverable has documented acceptance criteria signed at engagement kickoff. Nothing more, nothing less.

D_01

Model Registry

Versioning, metadata capture, and approval workflow from experiment to production.

D_02

CI/CD Pipeline

Automated build, evaluation, packaging, and deployment. Configuration-as-code handed over.

D_03 · CORE

Evaluation Suite

Automated evaluation harness with threshold gates. Blocks deployment when a candidate underperforms the live champion.

D_04

Monitoring Dashboards

Drift, performance, and business-metric dashboards, wired to alert model owners directly.

D_05 · RELEASE-READY

Runbooks & Release Governance

Full runbook set for drift response and rollback, an evidence-pack template for every release, and a signed release-governance charter defining who approves what.

HANDOVER
WK 10
§ 07 · OUTCOMES

Six outcome metrics,
measured pre and post.

Success is not "the pipeline is running." It is measured against six specific outcomes captured in a baseline report at engagement start and re-measured at steady state.

THE RELEASE FREQUENCY JOURNEY · REPRESENTATIVE
Weeks to hours, across the four phases.
−98%RELEASE TIME
21d16d10d5d021 daysBaselinePRE-ENGAGEMENT5 daysRegistry liveEND WK 0412 hoursCI/CD liveEND WK 072 hoursSteady state30 DAYS POST
01 · SPEED
10x+
Deployment frequency increase, same-class model releases.
02 · DRIFT
<24h
Time to detect statistically significant drift.
03 · ROLLBACK
<15min
Time to roll back a degraded release to last known-good.
04 · COVERAGE
100%
Releases passing through the automated evaluation gate.
05 · FAILURE
<5%
Post-release rollback rate, measured over 90 days.
06 · TCO
25–40%
3-year TCO reduction versus ad hoc manual deployment.
§ 08 · FIT

Honest scoping.

B3 is a fit when specific conditions are met. It is not a fit when other conditions are. We say so before the scope conversation, not after the commercial commitment.

PREREQUISITES
Move fast when these five conditions are in place at kickoff.
01
A model already exists and has been trained

B3 productionises an existing model. It does not build one from scratch.

02
A data science team as day-to-day counterpart

Signs off pipeline design, evaluation thresholds, and registry conventions. Typically 30% time commitment.

03
A reproducible training environment

If retraining can't be reproduced reliably, the registry has nothing trustworthy to version.

04
A named business owner for the model's KPI

Evaluation thresholds are meaningless without someone accountable for what "good" means commercially.

05
A change-management window of at least six weeks

Moving from manual deploy to a gated pipeline changes how the data science team ships work.

NOT SUITABLE IF
Four patterns indicate a different engagement is a better fit.
You don't have a trained model yet

There's nothing to productionise. Start with B1 Pilot Factory™.

The gap is model development, not operations

A better pipeline won't fix an underperforming model. That work stays with your data science team.

You want it managed, not built

B3 is a build engagement. For managed model operations, look at C8 MLOpsRun™.

Regulatory deadline is under 4 weeks

Six weeks is our minimum. We can accelerate pipeline design to produce a scorecard within 2 weeks, then B3 begins with registry setup.

§ 09 · COMMERCIAL

Fixed fee.
Milestone-based.

Total engagement fee agreed in the scope statement. Not time-and-materials. Not day rate. Every engagement is preceded by a scope conversation to ensure fit before commitment.

STANDARD MODEL
ENGAGEMENT MODEL
Fixed fee
PAYMENT CADENCE
Milestone-based

Payment schedule aligned to engagement phases and defined delivery milestones agreed upfront.


INCLUDED IN SCOPE
  • All 5 named deliverables with acceptance criteria
  • Named Practice Lead throughout the engagement
  • Bi-weekly executive sponsor reviews
  • 30/60/90-day post-handover check-ins
  • Written scope amendment process for any changes
01

Signed scope statement

Every engagement begins with a signed scope statement fixing deliverables, timeline, milestones, and commercial terms. No verbal agreements. No moving targets.

02

No scope creep

Scope changes require a signed scope amendment. If scope changes, so does the commercial arrangement — always in writing, always signed by both parties.

03

Named accountability

The Practice Lead is accountable for commercial and delivery outcomes throughout the engagement, with escalation to the CEO within 24 hours if needed.

§ 10 · QUESTIONS

Five, most asked.

Q_01Why isn't "deployed to production" enough?

Because deployed and operable are different claims. A model pushed to an endpoint with no version history, no evaluation gate, and no rollback path is a liability wearing production clothes.

B3 treats a model release the way mature engineering treats a code release: versioned, evaluated against a threshold before it ships, monitored for drift after it ships, and reversible within minutes if it degrades.

For a bank running credit-scoring or a hospital running triage support, a regulator will eventually ask how a specific prediction was produced by a specific model version on a specific date. "We're not sure, we've redeployed since" is not an acceptable answer. Production-grade means the answer is always available.

Q_02How is this different from generic DevOps for ML code?

Code DevOps versions and tests code artefacts. MLOps versions and tests model artefacts — weights, training data lineage, hyperparameters, and the evaluation metrics that justified promotion.

A code pipeline passes when tests pass; a model pipeline must pass an evaluation gate that compares performance against a live champion model on a held-out slice of real data, not a fixed unit test.

And code doesn't drift on its own — a model does, silently, as the world it was trained on shifts. Drift is not a bug; it's an expected failure mode that requires its own monitoring, its own alerting, and its own response runbook. B3 builds the pipeline and the gates around that distinction, not a CI job that happens to output a model file.

Q_03Can this support regulated environments?
Yes — that is the case B3 is most often built for. Registry entries, evaluation results, and deployment events are logged as an immutable audit trail; access controls are tightened to match your existing IAM posture rather than a generic default. For banking clients we design evidence packs with SAMA/CBUAE model-risk expectations in mind; for healthcare, ADHICS controls around clinical decision-support systems shape access and logging requirements. B3 is not itself a regulatory certification, and we say so plainly — but every artefact it produces is built to be handed to an examiner without a scramble.
Q_04Do you support cloud-native and on-premises deployment targets?
Yes. Registry, CI/CD, and monitoring patterns are designed against your actual deployment target during Phase 1 — a managed cloud ML platform, a Kubernetes-based on-premises cluster, or a hybrid split driven by data-residency rules. We don't assume a single hyperscaler's toolchain and hope it fits; the pipeline design stream exists precisely to avoid that assumption.
Q_05What comes after B3?
B3 builds the release pipeline and hands it over with runbooks and a trained model-owner. It does not run continuous operations. C8 MLOpsRun™ is the Run-tier retainer that operates what B3 builds — ongoing drift monitoring, retraining triggers, and release governance on a recurring cadence, with a named operator accountable for the model estate after handover.
§ 11 · NAMED ACCOUNTABILITY

One name
on the engagement letter.

A named Practice Lead is accountable for delivery, commercial outcomes, and the client relationship throughout the engagement. Not a project manager who disappears after kickoff. Not a partner who nods at the SOW and vanishes.

THE ROLE

Practice Lead — AI

Present at every phase gate, every scope decision, every difficult conversation. Available for 30/60/90-day post-handover check-ins as part of the engagement.

SIX ACCOUNTABILITIES
01
Commercial arrangement

Including scope amendments.

02
Deliverables acceptance

Signs off all 5 deliverables.

03
Bi-weekly reviews

With executive sponsor.

04
Change orders

Authorised to negotiate.

05
Escalation path

CEO within 24 hours.

06
Post-handover

30/60/90-day check-ins.

§ 13 · BOOK A CLINIC

Thirty minutes.
No slide deck.

A structured 30-minute scope conversation with the Practice Lead. You describe the current model deployment approach and where it's fragile. We describe whether B3 is the right engagement — and if not, what is.

Book a clinic →Email directly
DURATION
30 minutes
PREPARATION
None required
FOLLOW-UP
Written scope, 5 business days