Skip to main content
NexITC
B1 · AI · 8–12 WEEKS · BUILD

Pilots that
survive the demo.

B1 · Pilot Factory™ delivers one or two production-grade AI pilots in 8–12 weeks with measurable KPIs, governance guardrails, and Day-2 operational readiness. Not a proof of concept. Not a slide deck. A working pilot with a runbook, monitoring, and a scale plan.

DURATION
8–12 wks
DELIVERABLES
5 named
COMMERCIAL
Fixed fee
B1·PROJECTION / PILOT KPI TRAJECTORY
B1
STALLED POC
0%
PILOTS IN PRODUCTION
B1
STEADY
85%
KPI ACHIEVEMENT
WK 00
WK 03
WK 06
WK 09
STEADY
PILOTS
1 – 2
UAT PASS RATE
90%
KPI DELTA
35%
SCENARIO · INSURANCE CLAIMS · N=1
ILLUSTRATIVE
§ 00 · THESIS
01
WHY PILOTS
STALL.

Every UAE enterprise IT organisation we work with has an AI pilot graveyard. Ten POCs that demoed well and never left the innovation lab. Two production efforts that went live and got quietly rolled back. The pattern is always the same: pilots built without KPIs, without guardrails, without runbooks, without a plan for the day after the demo.

The instinct is to demand more pilots, or better pilots, or bigger pilots. The instinct is wrong. What is missing is not enthusiasm — it is delivery discipline. B1 treats a pilot as a production engagement from day one: measurable KPIs, RBAC and audit controls, evaluation harness, monitoring, and a scale plan. Two pilots built this way in 8–12 weeks are worth more than twenty POCs that never leave the lab.

STATE · POC
Impressive demo. No KPIs. No governance. No runbook. Quietly rolled back after 90 days.
STATE · PILOT
Measured KPIs. Approval gates. Monitoring. Runbook. Scale plan on the board's desk.
§ 01 · WORK STREAMS

Six streams,
ending in governed pilots.

Charter and integrations front-load in weeks 1–3. Build and evaluation overlap through weeks 4–9. UAT, runbooks, and scale planning close weeks 10–12.

STREAM 01
WK 01–02

Pilot charter

Business owner named. KPIs committed in writing. Guardrail requirements agreed (RBAC, audit, approvals, kill-switch). Data access and integration approvals secured.

STREAM 02
WK 02–04

Integration & data access

Source-system access wired: read from ERP, CRM, ITSM, data lake as scoped. Data quality baseline established. PDPL residency confirmed for any pilot processing personal data.

OUTCOME
1–2
PILOTS IN PRODUCTION
+ SCALE PLAN
STREAM 03
WK 03–08

Build

Model or agent built to charter. Prompt/model iteration against evaluation harness. Guardrails wired throughout — not bolted on afterwards. Configuration-as-code from day one.

STREAM 04
WK 05–09

Evaluation harness

Automated evaluation against agreed KPIs. Gold-standard test set curated with business owner. Threshold gates for hallucination, bias, and unsafe outputs. Run at every build.

STREAM 05
WK 08–11

UAT & Ops readiness

User acceptance testing with the pilot population. Runbooks written for the three most likely failure modes. Monitoring dashboard live. Rollback procedure rehearsed.

STREAM 06
WK 11–12

Handover & scale plan

Structured handover to the business owner's team (4–6 sessions). Scale plan written: what the pilot proved, what needs to change to scale, what it will cost. Board-ready.

EXPLICITLY NOT COVERED
Enterprise-wide rollout
beyond the pilot population. That's C2 CoE-as-a-Service™, our Run-tier scaling engagement.
Model retraining pipeline
for ML models needing production-grade MLOps. That's B3 MLOps Factory™ — often paired with B1 when the pilot is a supervised ML model.
§ 02 · TIMELINE

Twelve weeks maximum.
Eight minimum. Four phases.

Phase count is fixed. Duration flexes with data-access setup time, integration complexity, and pilot count (1 or 2). Milestones are signed gates — not aspirations.

WK 0102030405060708091011 · 12Phase 1 · CharterPhase 2 · BuildPhase 3 · Evaluate & UATPhase 4 · Handover & scaleCharter signedEND WK 03 · GATE 01Pilot builtEND WK 08 · GATE 02UAT passedEND WK 11 · GATE 03Handover completeEND WK 12 · GATE 04OPERATING RHYTHMDaily standup · Weekly business-owner check-in · Bi-weekly Practice Lead reviewNAMED ACCOUNTABILITYPractice Lead — AI (CEO escalation available)
§ 03 · APPROACH

Use cases scored,
not on executive enthusiasm.

Every candidate pilot use case runs a six-criteria scorecard in weeks 1–2. Each criterion scored 1–5 with documented evidence. Signed by the business owner before Phase 2 begins.

PILOT USE-CASE SCORECARD · TEMPLATE
CRITERIA · 06 · WEIGHTED 1–5
ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE RENDERING — actual scores are use-case-specific and derived from evidence gathered during discovery.
01
Business KPI clarity
Is the target metric measurable, agreed by the business owner, and worth measuring? Executive interest is not evidence.
4/5
02
Data readiness
Is the data accessible, labelled where needed, of adequate quality? PDPL residency confirmed for personal data.
3/5
03
Model feasibility
Does the state of the art suggest an achievable pilot? We do not build pilots for problems that require research breakthroughs.
4/5
04
Integration path
Can the pilot reach source systems and destinations with reasonable effort? Deep custom integration extends timeline.
3/5
05
Governance risk
PDPL, sector-specific regulation (SAMA, ADHICS), audit and evidentiary requirements. Higher risk narrows pilot scope.
5/5
06
Scale potential
If the pilot succeeds, is there a real path to enterprise scale? Pilots without scale paths are theatre.
4/5
!
DISCLOSURE · VENDOR-NEUTRALITY
NexITC maintains commercial arrangements with several AI platform and MLOps tool vendors — these are how specialist consultancies build sustainable practices. We do not disclose which arrangements exist publicly because we do not want them to influence tool choice by anyone reading this page. The scorecard exists precisely so selection happens on evidence, not on economics. In practice, we have recommended tools with which we have no partnership when the scorecard result favoured them.
§ 04 · ARCHITECTURE

From ungoverned POCs
to governed pilots.

A typical UAE enterprise arrives with several innovation-lab POCs running on unmanaged notebooks, hardcoded credentials, and no monitoring. The engagement establishes the delivery control plane every pilot inherits.

BEFORE · T=0
TYPICAL POC ESTATE
POC_01
Jupyter Notebook
LAB LAPTOP
POC_02
Vendor Playground
SANDBOX
POC_03
Hardcoded API Key
SHARED SLACK
POC_04
Ad-hoc Data Copy
CSV EXPORT
POC_05
Manual Evaluation
SPREADSHEET
POC_06
No Monitoring
ROLLBACK: NONE
POC_07 · GOVERNANCE
None (compliance discovers pilots after the fact)
OPERATIONAL REALITY
  • Demos succeed; production never happens
  • No KPI evidence for the board
  • Compliance team blocks go-live
  • Rollback is 'delete the notebook'
B1 · GOVERN
AFTER · STEADY STATE
GOVERNED PILOT DELIVERY
CONTROL_01
Pilot Delivery Plane
Charters · KPIs · Governance · Approvals
CONTROL_02
Ops Readiness Pack
Runbooks · Monitoring · Rollback · Handover
↓ CHARTERED · MEASURED · GOVERNED · HANDED OVER ↓
SOURCE SYSTEMS · RETAINED
Read-only access · not replicated
STEADY-STATE OUTCOME
  • 1–2 pilots live for the pilot population
  • KPI dashboard reporting to business owner weekly
  • Compliance evidence pack signed off
  • Scale plan on the board's desk

Reference pattern. Some pilots retain a small pre-production notebook environment for continued experimentation alongside the governed pilot. What always changes is that anything reaching real users passes through the delivery control plane.

§ 05 · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

An insurance claims
pilot, measured.

Representative pattern for a UAE insurer of this scale — 1.2M active policies, 900-person claims operation. Ranges reflect target outcomes NexITC underwrites in scope for this class of engagement. N=1 — illustrative composite, not a specific client.

SCENARIO / B1 / UAE INSURER · 1.2M POLICIES · 900 STAFF
DURATION · 10 WKS
CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY
85%
vs 68% baseline (rules-only)
CLAIMS CYCLE TIME
35%
reduction on triaged claims
PILOTS IN PRODUCTION
1 2
second pilot approved from evidence pack
SITUATION

UAE insurer. 1.2M active policies, 900-person claims operation. Two previous AI POCs — claims triage and fraud flagging — demoed successfully in 2024 and never reached production. Compliance blocked go-live both times on PDPL and audit concerns.

ENGAGEMENT

10-week B1. Weeks 1–3 charter and integrations. Weeks 4–8 model build with RBAC and audit wired from day one. Weeks 9–10 UAT with claims operations, runbook authoring, rollback rehearsal, handover to VP Claims.

OUTCOME

Claims triage pilot live in production for personal-lines motor. 85% classification accuracy vs 68% rules-only baseline. 35% cycle-time reduction. Compliance sign-off before go-live. Second pilot (fraud flagging) approved by board from B1 evidence pack.

§ 06 · DELIVERABLES

Five artifacts,
each with signed acceptance.

Every deliverable has documented acceptance criteria signed at engagement kickoff. Nothing more, nothing less.

D_01

Pilot Solution

Production-grade pilot for 1–2 use cases. RBAC, audit, evaluation harness, monitoring — all wired from day one. Configuration-as-code handed over.

D_02

KPI Dashboard

Business owner dashboard reporting the agreed KPIs from day one of pilot use. Not built after the demo — instrumented during build.

D_03 · CORE

Guardrails Pack

RBAC configuration, audit log spec, approval workflow, kill-switch procedure, evaluation-harness threshold gates. The document compliance signs off.

D_04

Ops Readiness Pack

Runbooks for the three most likely failure modes, monitoring dashboard spec, rollback procedure rehearsed with the ops team.

D_05 · BOARD-READY

Scale Plan

What the pilot proved, what needs to change to scale, what it will cost, and what the risks are. Written for the board, not the innovation lab. This is the deliverable that decides whether the second engagement happens.

HANDOVER
WK 12
§ 07 · OUTCOMES

Six outcome metrics,
measured pre and post.

Success is not “the pilot ran.” It is measured against six specific outcomes captured in a baseline report at engagement start and re-measured at pilot steady state.

THE KPI JOURNEY · REPRESENTATIVE
From POC theatre to measured pilot.
+85%ACCURACY UPLIFT
100%75%50%25%00%BaselinePRE-ENGAGEMENT35%Charter signedEND WK 0368%UAT passedEND WK 1185%Steady state30 DAYS POST
01 · ACCURACY
70–90%
Task accuracy on the pilot's target KPI, measured on gold-standard test set.
02 · CYCLE TIME
25–45%
Reduction in end-to-end cycle time for the pilot population's workflow.
03 · UAT
85+%
UAT pass rate on business-owner-defined acceptance criteria.
04 · GUARDRAILS
Meas.
Guardrail compliance rate — approvals, RBAC violations, audit completeness.
05 · ADOPTION
60+%
Pilot-population adoption within 30 days of go-live.
06 · READINESS
5 / 5
Ops-readiness pack complete: runbooks, monitoring, rollback, handover, scale plan.
§ 08 · FIT

Honest scoping.

B1 is a fit when specific conditions are met. It is not a fit when other conditions are. We say so before the scope conversation, not after the commercial commitment.

PREREQUISITES
Move fast when these five conditions are in place at kickoff.
01
A validated use case with a signed charter or equivalent

Business owner committed. KPIs proposed. Data access in principle agreed. If none of these exist, [[A11|A11 Agentic AI Readiness & Use-Case Discovery]] runs first.

02
Business owner as day-to-day counterpart

Signs off charter, evaluation gates, UAT. Typically 30% time commitment across the engagement.

03
Data access approvals in place before Phase 2

Legal and PDPL sign-off obtained. If personal data is involved, DPIA scoped. Access delays are the most common cause of B1 timeline slippage.

04
Integration paths to source systems agreed

ERP, CRM, ITSM, data lake — whatever the pilot reads from. If access is complex, extend timeline or narrow scope.

05
A named executive sponsor above the business owner

Someone who can defend the pilot when the business owner is on leave or reassigned. Pilots without executive cover stall.

NOT SUITABLE IF
Four patterns indicate a different engagement is a better fit.
You are exploring, not delivering

No validated use case yet. Start with A11 Agentic AI Readiness & Use-Case Discovery or A1 Boardroom-to-Backlog™.

The pilot needs supervised ML production pipeline

Bring B3 MLOps Factory™ alongside B1 — MLOps is not in B1's scope by default.

You want to scale across a portfolio, not build one pilot

That is C2 CoE-as-a-Service™ — Run-tier scaling, not Build-tier delivery.

Regulatory deadline is under 6 weeks

Eight weeks is our minimum. We can accelerate discovery into A11 to produce the charter within 2 weeks, then B1 begins with Phase 2.

§ 09 · COMMERCIAL

Fixed fee.
Milestone-based.

Total engagement fee agreed in the scope statement. Not time-and-materials. Not day rate. Every engagement is preceded by a scope conversation to ensure fit before commitment.

STANDARD MODEL
ENGAGEMENT MODEL
Fixed fee
PAYMENT CADENCE
Milestone-based

Payment schedule aligned to engagement phases and defined delivery milestones agreed upfront.


INCLUDED IN SCOPE
  • All 5 named deliverables with acceptance criteria
  • Named Practice Lead throughout the engagement
  • Bi-weekly executive sponsor reviews
  • 30/60/90-day post-handover check-ins
  • Written scope amendment process for any changes
01

Signed scope statement

Every engagement begins with a signed scope statement fixing deliverables, timeline, milestones, and commercial terms. No verbal agreements. No moving targets.

02

No scope creep

Scope changes require a signed scope amendment. If scope changes, so does the commercial arrangement — always in writing, always signed by both parties.

03

Named accountability

The Practice Lead is accountable for commercial and delivery outcomes throughout the engagement, with escalation to the CEO within 24 hours if needed.

§ 10 · QUESTIONS

Five, most asked.

Q_01Is a pilot really production-grade at 8–12 weeks?
Production-grade for a controlled scope, not for the entire enterprise. The pilot handles real data, real users, real UAT, and real operational load — but within a bounded population (one department, one workflow, one region). What you get is not a prototype that needs a second engagement to become production; it is a production pilot with the runbooks, monitoring, and rollback procedures already in place. Scaling to the full enterprise is a separate decision, informed by the pilot's actual measured performance.
Q_02What KPIs do you commit to before the engagement starts?
KPI targets are agreed in the scope statement based on your business case for the pilot. Typical KPI shapes: task accuracy, cycle time reduction, user adoption within the pilot population, guardrail compliance rate, and evaluation-harness pass rate. We instrument the KPI dashboard during build so measurement starts on day one of pilot use — not after. If your business case doesn't have measurable KPIs yet, we start with A11 Agentic AI Readiness & Use-Case Discovery first.
Q_03What happens if the pilot doesn't meet its KPIs?
The engagement still completes and hands over. The pilot is measured, the evidence pack goes to your board, and the scale plan honestly recommends against scaling or recommends what to fix first. This has happened. We do not report inflated numbers to make the engagement look successful. Specialist reputations do not survive dishonest evaluation reports.
Q_04Can we do 2 pilots in parallel within the same engagement?

Yes — the standard scope is 1–2 pilots. Two parallel pilots typically extend the engagement to the upper end of the 8–12 week range and require additional client-side stakeholder time (each pilot needs its own business owner).

If the two pilots share infrastructure or data foundations, we run them as coordinated workstreams. If they are unrelated, we run them as two independent tracks with a shared Practice Lead.

Q_05What comes after pilots succeed?
Scaling. Once one or two pilots have proven their KPIs in production, the question shifts from 'can this work' to 'how do we operate this across a portfolio.' That is C2 CoE-as-a-Service™ — a Run-tier engagement that scales delivery capability, governance patterns, and operating rhythm across multiple AI initiatives without you having to hire an internal Center of Excellence team.
§ 11 · NAMED ACCOUNTABILITY

One name
on the engagement letter.

A named Practice Lead is accountable for delivery, commercial outcomes, and the client relationship throughout the engagement. Not a project manager who disappears after kickoff. Not a partner who nods at the SOW and vanishes.

THE ROLE

Practice Lead — AI

Present at every phase gate, every scope decision, every difficult conversation. Available for 30/60/90-day post-handover check-ins as part of the engagement.

SIX ACCOUNTABILITIES
01
Commercial arrangement

Including scope amendments.

02
Deliverables acceptance

Signs off all 5 deliverables.

03
Bi-weekly reviews

With executive sponsor.

04
Change orders

Authorised to negotiate.

05
Escalation path

CEO within 24 hours.

06
Post-handover

30/60/90-day check-ins.

§ 13 · BOOK A CLINIC

Thirty minutes.
No slide deck.

A structured 30-minute scope conversation with the Practice Lead. You describe the current pilot pipeline, business case, and organisational pressure. We describe whether B1 is the right engagement — and if not, what is.

Book a clinic →Email directly
DURATION
30 minutes
PREPARATION
None required
FOLLOW-UP
Written scope, 5 business days